Forum Overview :: Reviews

Warhammer: Mark of Chaos is good by McMoo shoddy review company 11/30/2006, 2:59pm PST Nobody will be surprised, but the gamespot reviewer is a fucking moron. Orcs are not part of Chaos >:( You fight battles with regiments of units. Think Total War without the "Total" part. The opening intro is almost as good as Dawn of War. The first campaign has you fighting the TAINT of Chaos with human and elf armies. The second has you TAINTing it up with chaos and skaven (rat-men) armies. Campaigns involve clicking the next point along a set path with the occasional optional mission. Units and wargear are bought and between most missions. You have heroes you can attach to regiments. These heroes have skills (passive or active) you can can acquire or improve as they gain levels. Hero skills are divided into three sections, ones that affect the hero only, ones that are only available during duels, and ones that affect both the hero and the attached regiment. Spells and active skills deplete an army-wide pool of mana or whatever that gradually refills. The duel system becomes active once 2 opposing heroes come within a certain range of one another. I haven't seen much use of dueling within battles. Some optional missions are duels. Anyway I found single player really fun, i tried using multi just to play skirmishes with the computer and it seems pretty terrible. More to come.

Warhammer: Mark of Chaos is good by McMoo shoddy review company 11/30/2006, 2:59pm PST     Oh yeah by McMoo shoddy review company 11/30/2006, 3:00pm PST         the main complaint I've heard.... by Flavio 11/30/2006, 7:18pm PST             Re: the main complaint I've heard.... by McMoo shoddy review company 12/01/2006, 8:57am PST                 usually around 8-11 pm EST NT by Flavio 12/01/2006, 3:18pm PST     NEEDS MORE GUNS NT by Jhoh Cable o_O 11/30/2006, 9:49pm PST