|
by laudablepuss 09/14/2006, 6:03pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Furcifer wrote:
laudablepuss wrote:
Anyway, for purposes of an internet conversation about videogaming, if someone cites Wikipedia and someone else thinks the information is bogus, they need to go find the accurate data.
So what exactly makes unsourced infomation posted on Wikipedia any more valid than, say for example, this?
That's a discussion the Qt3 people will never have apparently because only one side is ever required to try to back up their argument.
In any event, I'd suggest the reason is this study. EB's hysterical complaining notwithstanding. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|