|
by corax 05/18/2006, 11:29pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fullofkittens wrote:
That memory at 0x00000000 could not be "read" error also can be a precursor to HD failure
But it almost always isn't. This error is simply the result of a program attempting to dereferene a null pointer:
Wikipedia wrote:
In computer science, a pointer is a programming language datatype whose value refers directly to ("points to") another value stored elsewhere in the computer memory using its address. Obtaining the value that a pointer refers to is called dereferencing the pointer.
. . .
A null pointer has a reserved value, often but not necessarily the value zero, indicating that it refers to no object. Null pointers are used routinely, particularly in C and C++, to represent exceptional conditions. . . Because it refers to nothing, an attempt to dereference a null pointer causes a run-time error that usually terminates the program immediately (in the case of C, often with a segmentation fault, since the address literally corresponding to the null pointer will likely not be allocated to the running program). In C based languages (such as the ones used to write MS Windows) null always equals zero. When a Windows program tries to dereference a null pointer, the operating system sees the program trying to access memory at location zero (0x00000000) and throws an error. It's possible that a bad hard disk could cause this kind of error by mangling your data, but it's far more likely the result of a simple programming mistake. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Build My Computer: Summer 2006 Edition by Ray of Light 05/18/2006, 12:59pm PDT 
and just one more thing by Ray of Light 05/18/2006, 1:04pm PDT 
You are insane by McMoo The Anti-Drug Cow 05/18/2006, 5:06pm PDT 
Re: You are insane by Ray of Light 05/18/2006, 5:40pm PDT 
"read" and "write" errors by laudablepuss 05/18/2006, 5:52pm PDT 
I get those all the time, too. It can be a software issue. by Fullofkittens 05/18/2006, 7:07pm PDT 
0xDEADBEEF by corax 05/18/2006, 11:29pm PDT 
Sound by Fussbett 05/18/2006, 9:36pm PDT 
One year later by Ray of Light 06/03/2007, 7:59pm PDT 
Re: One year later by jeep 06/11/2007, 10:05pm PDT 
|
|