|
by Motherhead 01/24/2006, 1:23am PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
I need clarification wrote:
They're crying right into their vaginas because Apple has abandoned Motorola (or whatever) in favor of Intel. It's too much to contemplate, because the precious "look and feel" they've been treasuring for twenty years won't change at all, but INSIDE IT WILL BE DIFFERENT.
Also, dirty Windows users might make a Mac that dual boots into Windows, crushing at least 1 million monocles right into eye sockets across the world simultaneously.
I wonder how the Fedora guy is handling all of this.
The crying is not over the hardware shift, it's over the performance claims made by Jobs when he announced the new Macs. Also, fuck them for crying about anything at all. My only problem with the Intel shift is that it's Intel and not AMD, at least for desktops. I am all over Intel for laptops though, and already have my preorder in. As for dual booting - I am COUNTING on the fucking thing being able to dual boot and will be disappointed if, ultimately, it can't. An apple spokesman last year, when all this was announced, mentioned that Apple doesn't support Windows on Macs, but will do nothing special to prevent it from being installed on Apple hardware. Why would they mind? they already took your money on the hardware sale and don't give a shit what you run on it, but with that disclaimer they sure as fuck won't have to support you when Windows inevitably .dll-rots and crashes on launch. Good for them.
As with most things, the most clueless faggots are the loudest ones and Apple queers are no more loud and clueless than Windows faggots are (scaled proportionally to reflect marketshare.) |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Mac users loyal not to Apple, but to past by I need clarification 01/24/2006, 12:19am PST 
Buh? by Motherhead 01/24/2006, 1:23am PST 
Re: Buh? by corax 01/24/2006, 2:49am PST 
Re: Buh? by Motherhead 01/24/2006, 3:10am PST 
Re: Buh? by corax 01/24/2006, 11:24am PST 
Re: Buh? by Motherhead 01/24/2006, 12:29pm PST 
Re: Buh? by corax 01/24/2006, 7:01pm PST 
All 4 OSX 10.0 image processing hackers: snubbed NT by Entropy Stew 01/24/2006, 8:08pm PST 
Re: All 4 OSX 10.0 image processing hackers: snubbed by corax 01/25/2006, 7:06am PST 
Re: All 4 OSX 10.0 image processing hackers: snubbed by Entropy Stew 01/25/2006, 11:23am PST 
Re: All 4 OSX 10.0 image processing hackers: snubbed by Motherhead 01/25/2006, 11:45am PST 
With that said... by Motherhead 01/25/2006, 12:14pm PST 
Update on Adobe Updates by corax 02/02/2006, 4:28pm PST 
Re: Update on Adobe Updates by Motherhead 02/02/2006, 8:48pm PST 
Re: Buh? by co2 01/24/2006, 9:53am PST 
Re: Buh? by Entropy Stew 01/24/2006, 11:21am PST 
Re: Buh? by Ice Cream Jonsey 01/24/2006, 11:27am PST 
It's like I don't even know you NT by Entropy Stew 01/24/2006, 11:48am PST 
Re: Buh? by McMoo the Anti-Drug Cow 01/24/2006, 11:54am PST 
Creative's newer ones are much better than my old model by Entropy Stew 01/24/2006, 12:24pm PST 
*raising my hand* I like Office 2003. It's pretty good. NT by laudablepuss 01/24/2006, 1:52pm PST 
Re: Buh? by Motherhead 01/24/2006, 1:38pm PST 
Re: Buh? by Quentin Beck 01/24/2006, 3:51pm PST 
Re: Buh? by Co2 01/24/2006, 3:55pm PST 
Haha, someone was "annoyed" and you were like "fuck the attitude". NT by Fussbett 01/24/2006, 4:48pm PST 
ow, not so much teeth, fussbet NT by dick of Steve Jobs 01/24/2006, 5:00pm PST 
Yeah, you nailed it. I'm a huge Apple fan. NT by Fussbett 01/24/2006, 5:12pm PST 
embarassed, that's how the guy should have been and probably secretly was by co2 01/24/2006, 6:14pm PST 
Re: Buh? by Entropy Stew 01/24/2006, 8:01pm PST 
Re: Buh? by Motherhead 01/24/2006, 9:22pm PST 
Re: don't be messin w/ jouney by co2 01/24/2006, 9:35pm PST 
co2, if they EVER hurts you by Steve Perry 01/24/2006, 9:50pm PST 
"hurt" you, i mean. aw fuck it NT by Steve Perry 01/24/2006, 9:50pm PST 
hahah fag NT by neil schonn 01/24/2006, 9:50pm PST 
An unfunny reply by mark 01/25/2006, 4:17pm PST 
|
|