Forum Overview :: OMM and Caltrops History
 
Something Awful's Worst Gaming Journalism of 2005 by Fussbett 01/08/2006, 1:47pm PST
OMM wouldn't break it up into two parts just to be annoying, but here's Something Awful's attack on videogame journalism, 2005: Part 1, and Part 2. OMM would've done part 1, and then stopped.

Nothing as outrageous as the famous "we are the masks we wear" review, but still some good bits:

The theory goes like this. If we're looking at computer games, when videogame manufacture was first democratised by the appearance of home computers no one had any idea what they were doing so they were forced to invent by necessity. Ideas were thrown together just to see what operated well, or even operated at all. These times I'll describe vaguely as "pre-genre".

Eventually, however, they hardened into solidified idea-clusters which were the modern genres, each with specific characteristics. In fact, if a game failed to fulfil some of these criteria, it could often be dismissed as a bad game, when in reality it was just a bad example of a particular genre and really succeeded as something else.
NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Something Awful's Worst Gaming Journalism of 2005 by Fussbett 01/08/2006, 1:47pm PST NEW
    He was being pretentious as a big joke! :D by Worm 01/08/2006, 3:33pm PST NEW
        Re: He was being pretentious as a big joke! :D by Fussbett 01/08/2006, 4:18pm PST NEW
            he looks like the kid in highschool who carried a briefcase instead of backpack NT by hoping to god that people noticed 01/08/2006, 9:18pm PST NEW
    Are their frontpage articles hard to read or what? NT by Creexul :( 01/09/2006, 12:25am PST NEW
        or what? NT by Ghostwriter 01/09/2006, 6:48pm PST NEW
            I guess the alternative is that they are like reading a brick wall. NT by Creexul :( 01/11/2006, 7:08pm PST NEW
 
powered by pointy