Forum Overview :: Motherfucking News
 
Re: He's lived without fame for the past three years or so, so why not? by Amazon.com reviewer 08/23/2003, 4:00pm PDT
Of Blaine's book:

Other than that the book has a lot of pictures. I thought this was a nice touch because it gives the book personality. However, there were two photos I objected to. One is a picture of Blaine standing on a rooftop with the burning Twin Towers in the background on Sept. 11. Given the seriousness of that event, I thought it was in poor taste to view it as a photo opportunity. There are a million pictures of the Twin Towers on fire. We don't need another one with Blaine in it. The other picture is one of a naked David Blaine with some stuff painted on his arm. He's in a position where you can't see anything "private", but frankly I found it more silly than artistic. I think sometimes Blaine takes himself too seriously.


EMPHASIS MINE!!!!!!!!!!!!
PREVIOUS REPLY QUOTE
 
He's lived without fame for the past three years or so, so why not? by I need clarification 08/23/2003, 2:45pm PDT NEW
    Re: He's lived without fame for the past three years or so, so why not? by Amazon.com reviewer 08/23/2003, 4:00pm PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy