pretentious barely coherent fruit wrote:

A reviewer as I understand is there not for discuss design decissions, but to judge the quality of the game and how it translates to the player. Most of the things on that text speak about features that are not bad per se, only he doesn´t agree with them, but doesn´t afect the game at all (maybe afect to the game he would like to see).

However, is what he thinks, respect his view. But will like stop seeing things like "you know, reviewers at magazines are busy guys that have no a clue and only think at deadline" I´m pretty tired of it, and for some reasons is a thing use to find on this type of reviews that pretend to be "the real truth". Find normal people say this type of things on a forum, but not in your own review.

The guy that reviewed SS2 at my mag played to death, we have not deadlines most of the time since we are online, and he loved it. How explain that? Lacks of taste? No, just diferent types of pointviews.

You don´t like the game, others do, live with it. Never try my readers think the same as I. Just say what I think and what the game can offer, and how I saw it, then let them judge if they share my view or not.

If the writer of the review is reading this. Sorry If I look harsh or something, don´t pretend it. Respect your view and is a cleverly written text, just I don´t share some of your points.