Forum Overview :: Motherfucking News
 
Re: ugh by Monty Cantsin 07/27/2003, 2:39pm PDT
Tom-Foolery Constructor wrote:

It amazes me how experts in communication always produce writing that's like trying to solve a rubik's cube while completely submerged in molasses. I understand how scientists and engineers have their whole lexicon of specialized terms that you need training to understand, but shouldn't the study of linguistics be about making it easier to communicate complex ideas to others instead of complexifying them to the point where only fellow specialists understand that you're calling Chompsky a fag?


no.

/mc
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Chomsky Part 2 by Choson 07/27/2003, 2:18pm PDT NEW
    ugh by Tom-Foolery Constructor 07/27/2003, 2:26pm PDT NEW
        Re: ugh by Monty Cantsin 07/27/2003, 2:39pm PDT NEW
        linguistics is actually meta-linguistics, so no. NT by Senor Barorito 07/27/2003, 2:46pm PDT NEW
    Re: Chomsky Part 2 by Lizard_King 07/28/2003, 7:02pm PDT NEW
        Chomsky is to intellectual liberals what Michael Moore is to compassion-liberals by Senor Barborito 07/28/2003, 9:56pm PDT NEW
            So many oxymorons, so little time. by Lizard_King 07/28/2003, 10:27pm PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy