 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| A sequel to Kingdom Of Fire that might actually not suck? by curst 07/24/2003, 12:08pm PDT | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| In my quest to find games that basically work off of the great Dynasty Warriors formula but improve upon it (thusfar I've found... nothing), I stumbled upon, of all the fucking things...
Kingdom Under Fire:Crusaders I played the original KUF, and ouch, it was Rune, except in the guise of an RTS that couldn't even toss in vikings, let alone anything else of interest. KUF:C, on the other hand, looks like fucking WOW, man. But that's just Gamespot's screenshots that I'm working off of when I say that. Has anyone heard of any info about whether it has a chance of not sucking despite the awfulness of its predecessor? The previews I've read either A: have no info, B: are so hilariously wrong that I can't get past the first paragraph (actual quote from ActionTrip: "the popular real-time strategy Kingdom Under Fire"), or C: mention something about how it might appeal to Dynasty Warriors fans, unless it doesn't. |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
A sequel to Kingdom Of Fire that might actually not suck? by 07/24/2003, 12:08pm PDT  Re: A sequel to Kingdom Of Fire that might actually not suck? by 07/24/2003, 4:59pm PDT Re: A sequel to Kingdom Of Fire that might actually not suck? by 07/25/2003, 9:48am PDT |
