|
by SBDMT 07/01/2003, 3:59pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Glycerine wrote:
some expertise over the English language
Yup, that's what you said alright. Amazing how you manage to assault his command of the language and then immediately disqualify the attack, all in the same sentence. I think it has something to do with you not being very bright, which sufficiently explains why you bothered to rebut his review in manner you have chosen.
A few juicy excerpts:
Fabio...you are a fucking dumb-ass
Wow! Now THAT's how to start a review. Fabio, take note
Why would you even bother to clutter up the 'net with this trash to begin with?
See Fabio? Notice how he masterfully illustrates what your review lacks in the same stroke that he asks the really tough questions.
Shock 2 was released years ago...
Intriguing, he opens my eyes to an absurdity we tolerate every day in American culture: LITERATURE HAS A FUCKING SHELF-LIFE! Games too, it appears; I mean, SS2 was so long ago, it's like, you know, not even really a game anymore. Technically.
so I would say it's a pretty safe assumption
Once again, we see Fabio is one-upped by his opponent, who defies conventional wisdom and breaks all the modern rules about assumptions, and makes one.
that most people have already formulated their opinions
Yeah, since they don't sell this game anymore, I'm not gonna let Fabio's idiotic review stop me from buying it! SS2 RULEZ!
It seems to me that you have personal issues with this game
Yeah, Fabs. Maybe if you had given an overview of the game based on, you know, a less personal experience, you could have done your audience a better service. I mean, didn't you even fucking skim through IGN's review? What do YOU know about videogames, anyway? No wonder Lookinglass didn't pay you for your review...or reward you with E3 booth priviledges
which is probably what prompted you to write a review about it almost 4 years after the fact
Yeah, this was the dealbreaker for me too. It's bad enough that the review sucked so much ass, but did we REALLY have to be taken through the tumultuous ride of his repressed rage and anguish, which was only now boiling to the surface? Maybe if you had said something about it a year or two ago...
Do me a favor
Do us all a favor.
stick to games that a simple minded person such as yourself can understand.
Oooh SPNAK! I hope by the time you're done drying your eyes and wiping your nose that you've manage to uninstall everything that isn't Quake from your system. And when you play Quake, DONT try to rocket-jump. It's too clever, and totally out-of-character for you, simpleton.
And hey!
He's such a good sport, he continues even after he's delivered his coup de grace. Fabio: pwnz0r3d
Since you enjoy writing reviews for games
Didn't sound like Fabio enjoyed it too much, so that must be a zing! HE'S UNSTOPPABLE!
that are way past their time This statement could be miscontrued as weak, if it didn't contain some examples. Such as...
why not throw up something for Doom, Quake, and Duke3D?
I think he's calling you out, Fabio. And this time, he means business.
Surely your lack of intelligence won't hurt you there...I mean hell, all you have to do is shoot everything that moves...you can handle that, right?
He even desires to end his otherwise scathing rebuttal on a positive note. I salute his sportsmanship.
PS - I changed my mind. You fucking suck. Your writing is ass. Don't write anything else again...ever
SIKE!
Tell me, did you happen to point others from TTLG(or wherever) to this thread to come revel in your wit? I look forward to hearing from them too. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
WTF? by Glycerine 06/30/2003, 2:10pm PDT 
Re: WTF? by Entropy Stew 06/30/2003, 2:26pm PDT 
Re: WTF? by FoK 06/30/2003, 3:54pm PDT 
Re: WTF? by daveodeth 06/30/2003, 6:33pm PDT 
Re: WTF? by Glycerine 07/01/2003, 1:10pm PDT 
Re: WTF? by SBDMT 07/01/2003, 4:13pm PDT 
I already have a negative review of Qake 2 if anyone wants that. by Jhoh Creexul 07/01/2003, 1:07am PDT 
Re: WTF? by Thundercok 06/30/2003, 6:59pm PDT 
Re: WTF? by FABIO 07/01/2003, 12:55am PDT 
Re: WTF? by Entropy Stew 07/01/2003, 12:26pm PDT 
Re: WTF? by Glycerine 07/01/2003, 1:25pm PDT 
Aw fuck. I think you out-edgied all of us. NT by Senor Barborito 07/01/2003, 1:36pm PDT 
Verifiably false by laudablepuss 07/01/2003, 1:52pm PDT 
'your' NT by Grammar Nazi Barborito 07/01/2003, 2:21pm PDT 
i think it was ironic NT by FABIO 07/01/2003, 3:03pm PDT 
You know what's ironic? by Senor Barborito 07/01/2003, 3:05pm PDT 
more blowjobs, V! NT by FABIO 07/01/2003, 3:22pm PDT 
Re: i think it was ironic by laudablepuss 07/01/2003, 4:02pm PDT 
A trend by FABIO 07/01/2003, 3:11pm PDT 
well fuck me, fixed quotes by FABIO 07/01/2003, 3:16pm PDT 
Expertise OVER the English Language? by SBDMT 07/01/2003, 3:59pm PDT 
"some expertise over the English language."? by Lizard_King 07/01/2003, 10:02pm PDT 
Note to self: read entire thread before posting. NT by Lizard_King 07/01/2003, 10:04pm PDT 
Helpful Writing Hint by Mood: Perplexed 07/01/2003, 3:31pm PDT 
Re: Helpful Writing Hint by Ice Cream Jonsey 07/01/2003, 3:56pm PDT 
Re: Helpful Writing Hint by Bill Dungsroman 07/01/2003, 5:26pm PDT 
Was GK3 worse than 2? by Lizard_King 07/01/2003, 10:08pm PDT 
Logarithmically by Bill Dungsroman 07/01/2003, 11:30pm PDT 
Re: Logarithmically by FABIO 07/02/2003, 12:15am PDT 
Re: Logarithmically by curst 07/02/2003, 9:22am PDT 
Re: Logarithmically by Bill Dungsroman 07/02/2003, 12:54pm PDT 
Exponentially, you math fruit by Bitter 07/02/2003, 1:29am PDT 
Dude, I don't know my asymptote from a hole in the graph by Bill Dungsroman 07/02/2003, 12:50pm PDT 
I found the above funny. I am an incredible nerd. NT by creativepig 07/02/2003, 7:53pm PDT 
Re: Logarithmically by laudablepuss 07/02/2003, 11:08pm PDT 
Re: Logarithmically by Lizard_King 07/02/2003, 11:36pm PDT 
I am adopting the phrase "The emperor has no code" NT by FABIO 07/02/2003, 12:13am PDT 
|
|