|
by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 6:40pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
jeffd wrote:
I've never once spammed this site. Matter of fact this is (I think) my third post total. Granted two were under variants of the "Lollerson" nick but neither were inflamatory - they were just asking honest questions - matter of fact the first one was asking whether or not use of the "Lollerson" nick was a bannable offense. I guess I got my answer.
That said, can you explain exactly why I was banned? Cuz it certainly had nothing to do with me being a spammer.
JD
To be frank, that's bull and you know it. You and your friends posted 10, 20, however many crap posts from different IPs, proxies in the Vatican city, etc. Doesn't cut it - you are intentionally cluttering the boards with a slew of useless posts and just because you distribute your efforts to come from multiple people in an intentional effort to fuck with the boards and give the admins a hard time doesn't make each of you innocent. You knew exactly what you were doing and that's why we have laws like 'bad faith' and 'aiding and abetting' - no judge is going to throw out a case of a gang committing a crime because they each only committed a little bit of one. You all made a decision to fuck with the boards as individuals, and it comes down to that. You're all going to be banned and have your posts deleted for that decision - no other admin on the Internet would let you get away with as much as you have (continuing to post), and if there's anything I did wrong in this situation it's that. No judge or jury is going to buy 'well we each only stabbed him once so it's not murder' I have to play judge, jury, and executioner here, and quite frankly I won't be jerked around by semantic games.
I would like for you now to tell me the name of ONE other message board where participating in a spamathon with multiple other people earns you the right to whine after the fact about your post being deleted because you were only responsible for three of the posts in the forum raid. Go on. One.
You can't do it. I certainly can't, and nobody else can either. Why? Because that's a bullshit argument and you know it. I've been more than fair by not deleting the post I'm responding to and banning the corresponding IP as well. You know that.
This discussion *door slams* is OVER.
--SB |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
Vaginas. by Immodium AD 06/04/2003, 7:29pm PDT 
a modest proposal by son of steve lollerson 06/04/2003, 7:37pm PDT 
Re: a modest proposal by daughter of steve lollerson 06/04/2003, 7:41pm PDT 
Wahahaha! YR funny! by FoK 06/04/2003, 7:42pm PDT 
(Note on that) by FoK 06/04/2003, 7:45pm PDT 
You're such a pussy, Kittens. NT by TO CLARIFY 06/05/2003, 12:28am PDT 
Yes. by FoK 06/05/2003, 8:17am PDT 
Try not to be such goddamn fruits by Chet Stew 06/04/2003, 7:59pm PDT 
WTF is this? *You're* the funny one, *I'm* the abusive unstable one. by Erik Barborito 06/04/2003, 8:02pm PDT 
Meant to include this: "Why do I have to be the girl?" NT by Erik Barborito 06/04/2003, 8:03pm PDT 
Because I have the bigger dick? NT by Entropy Stew 06/04/2003, 8:06pm PDT 
Only in the Freudian 'ego' sense (you are SO very, very banned) NT by Senor Barborito 06/04/2003, 8:10pm PDT 
The feds are already en route to your shed in Montana NT by Entropy Stew 06/04/2003, 8:19pm PDT 
Also: In my case, more like "superego" NT by Entropy Stew 06/04/2003, 8:20pm PDT 
I magically become an asshole when somebody fucks with the site by Entropy Stew 06/04/2003, 8:18pm PDT 
Re: I magically become an asshole when somebody fucks with the site by daughter of steve lollerson 06/04/2003, 8:40pm PDT 
Re: I magically become an asshole when somebody fucks with the site by S. Lollerson Esquire 06/04/2003, 8:42pm PDT 
Re: I magically become an asshole when somebody fucks with the site by son of steve lollerson 06/04/2003, 8:52pm PDT 
Re: I magically become an asshole when somebody fucks with the site by Not Steve Lollerson 06/04/2003, 9:24pm PDT 
Re: I magically become an asshole when somebody fucks with the site by steve lollerson's right hand man 06/04/2003, 9:37pm PDT 
murmur by Stephen Lollerson 06/04/2003, 10:28pm PDT 
Re: I magically become an asshole when somebody fucks with the site by regular lurker 06/04/2003, 9:48pm PDT 
I'll answer by Senor Barborito 06/04/2003, 10:52pm PDT 
Re: I'll answer by regular lurker 06/04/2003, 11:01pm PDT 
More answers by Senor Barborito 06/04/2003, 11:18pm PDT 
Third Stooge, checking in. by Fussbett 06/05/2003, 12:53am PDT 
Why I outta... by Entropy Stew 06/05/2003, 2:37am PDT 
Re: Why I outta... by wide hurt 06/05/2003, 2:49am PDT 
^ GOOD IDEA HERE ^ by Lufteufel 06/05/2003, 1:58pm PDT 
A call for reconsideration by Pathos 06/05/2003, 3:30am PDT 
Perhaps you missed... by Entropy Stew 06/05/2003, 3:55am PDT 
Re: Perhaps you missed... by Chet Lollerson 06/05/2003, 12:38pm PDT 
You have a really bad memory for OMM by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 11:05am PDT 
I have an excellent memory of everything else, then by Pathos Lollerson 06/05/2003, 6:36pm PDT 
GO. FUCKING. AWAY. by Chairman Mao 06/07/2003, 2:50am PDT 
FAG NO TEXT by Bill Dungsroman 06/05/2003, 1:11pm PDT 
dear formerly funny HSW by Chet Lollerson 06/05/2003, 1:53pm PDT 
it seems there are two versions of reality out there NT by foogla 06/05/2003, 3:46pm PDT 
Dear boring faggot by Bill Dungsroman 06/05/2003, 8:19pm PDT 
Might I suggest a NEW RULE by Roop Dirump 06/06/2003, 1:35pm PDT 
Re your spammer theory by jeffd 06/05/2003, 6:13pm PDT 
Re: Re your spammer theory by Ice Cream Jonsey 06/05/2003, 6:32pm PDT 
Re: Re your spammer theory by J. "Lollerson" D. 06/05/2003, 6:45pm PDT 
Serves you right for faking. NT by foogla 06/05/2003, 7:16pm PDT 
Oh for the love of . . . are you for real? by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 6:40pm PDT 
Re: Oh for the love of . . . are you for real? by Chet Lollerson 06/05/2003, 6:52pm PDT 
Re: Oh for the love of . . . are you for real? by Chet Lollerson 06/05/2003, 6:58pm PDT 
Re: Oh for the love of . . . are you for real? by jeffd 06/05/2003, 7:01pm PDT 
wait we both posted basically the same thing twice. Is this SPAM?! ono!!! NT by Chet Lollerson 06/05/2003, 7:04pm PDT 
Wrong by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 7:06pm PDT 
Re: Wrong by Chet Lollerson 06/05/2003, 7:13pm PDT 
Re: Wrong by jeffd 06/05/2003, 7:17pm PDT 
Re: Wrong by Bill Dungsroman 06/05/2003, 8:52pm PDT 
Re: Wrong by Stever Lollerson, Attorney At Law 06/06/2003, 10:59am PDT 
Re: Wrong by laudablepuss 06/06/2003, 7:42pm PDT 
Re: Wrong by Moshe Lollerstein 06/07/2003, 1:10am PDT 
Re: Oh for the love of . . . are you for real? by jeffd 06/05/2003, 6:58pm PDT 
You're goddamned right, SB!!! by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 7:43pm PDT 
Re: You're goddamned right, SB!!! by Your old friend 06/05/2003, 7:54pm PDT 
Re: You're goddamned right, SB!!! by wide hurt 06/05/2003, 9:37pm PDT 
There, there, Kitten. by I need clarification 06/06/2003, 2:54am PDT 
Re: There, there, INC. by Bill Dungsroman 06/06/2003, 4:07am PDT 
Ugh, you too? by I need clarification 06/06/2003, 4:27am PDT 
Re: Ugh, you too? by Bill Dungsroman 06/06/2003, 4:37am PDT 
Re: Ugh, you too? by I need clarification 06/06/2003, 4:42am PDT 
Re: Ugh, you too? by Bill Dungsroman 06/06/2003, 4:53am PDT 
Re the dent in your head by Bill Dungsroman 06/05/2003, 7:53pm PDT 
Sheesh by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 8:11pm PDT 
No Caltrops posters were ever harmed. I promise you that. by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 8:23pm PDT 
INC: The shit that won't flush down the toilet by Bill Dungsroman 06/05/2003, 8:41pm PDT 
You're not Chet, you're fucking SB by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 8:53pm PDT 
Re: You're not Chet, you're fucking SB by FoK 06/05/2003, 8:55pm PDT 
And you're, as usual, boring. by Bill Dungsroman 06/05/2003, 9:11pm PDT 
Re: And you're, as usual, boring. by Indeed certification 06/05/2003, 9:15pm PDT 
Wrong! HA! I win. NT by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 9:16pm PDT 
You're with the crazies!!! by I need clarification 06/05/2003, 9:15pm PDT 
Re: You're with the crazies!!! by Indeed certification 06/05/2003, 9:23pm PDT 
Let's be frank by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 9:28pm PDT 
Re: You're with the crazies!!! by Moab 06/06/2003, 4:38am PDT 
Re: You're with the crazies!!! by Bill Dungsroman 06/06/2003, 4:55am PDT 
Shut up, Moab. NT by I need clarification 06/06/2003, 5:18am PDT 
Re: INC: The shit that won't flush down the toilet by Jhoh Creexul 06/06/2003, 5:08am PDT 
Laughing out loud. by Fussbett 06/06/2003, 1:16am PDT 
Re: Re the dent in your head by Chet Lollerson 06/06/2003, 10:35am PDT 
Re: Re the dent in your head by Lufteufel 06/06/2003, 3:52pm PDT 
I'm not sure if you're obtuse or just waiting for the obvious answer. by I need clarification 06/06/2003, 3:58pm PDT 
Re: I'm not sure if you're obtuse or just waiting for the obvious answer. by foogla 06/06/2003, 6:56pm PDT 
wouldnt the simpler solution be to stop revealing so much personal shit at #GA? NT by Colonel Obvious 06/05/2003, 8:12am PDT 
Re: wouldnt the simpler solution be to stop revealing so much personal shit at #GA? by foogla 06/05/2003, 8:18am PDT 
I left when Caltrops started, and that was among the reasons. NT by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 11:13am PDT 
Re: Why I outta... by Old Man Lollerson 06/05/2003, 12:35pm PDT 
What I lack in punctuality I recoup in length. by Fussbett 06/06/2003, 2:31am PDT 
Re: What I lack in punctuality I recoup in length. by laudablepuss 06/09/2003, 3:36pm PDT 
Re: I'll answer by Chairman Mao 06/04/2003, 11:18pm PDT 
Re: I'll answer by purple pariah 06/04/2003, 11:36pm PDT 
My apologies, please email me with your IP address and some abusive profanity by Senor Barborito 06/04/2003, 11:45pm PDT 
christ I'm full of stupidity today. Here's the address. by Senor Barborito 06/04/2003, 11:49pm PDT 
Re: christ I'm full of stupidity today. Here's the address. by jesus lollerson christ 06/05/2003, 12:03am PDT 
Let me be blunt: EMAIL ME, OONY KTHX YOU HIDEOUS FAG AND I'M REALLY SORRY. NT by Senor Barborito 06/05/2003, 12:18am PDT 
SENOR BARBORNORO, BANNED FOR SPAMMING!!!!!!!!!! NT by Jhoh Creexul 06/05/2003, 1:08am PDT 
Re: I'll answer by Jhoh Creexul 06/05/2003, 12:44am PDT 
Creexul... by Bill Dungsroman 06/05/2003, 8:45pm PDT 
Re: Creexul... by Jhoh Creexul 06/06/2003, 12:59am PDT 
Re: Creexul... by Bill Dungsroman 06/06/2003, 4:56am PDT 
HI! Im the fairy formerly known as homosayswhat by Mark Roofleford 06/06/2003, 10:38am PDT 
Re: HI! Im the fairy formerly known as homosayswhat by FABIO 06/06/2003, 1:34pm PDT 
Thanks for coming to the meeting by robert pollerson 06/07/2003, 2:40am PDT 
Re: Thanks for coming to the meeting by Old Man Lollerson 06/09/2003, 3:21pm PDT 
Re: Vaginas. by Immodium A"Lollerson"D 06/04/2003, 9:46pm PDT 
If you feel like coding it I'll send you the source NT by Entropy Stew 06/05/2003, 12:46am PDT 
I guess it could have been worse, I guess I could have been banned for asking. by Immodium A\"Lollerson\"D 06/05/2003, 1:28am PDT 
Someone call the Chinese Lawyer! NT by Dong Longley 06/05/2003, 2:43pm PDT 
|
|