|
by Chairman Mao 04/09/2003, 3:36pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Ray, of Light wrote:
Scientific fields aren't free of that. "Programming is all about style; why should my inspired ass have to learn when and where a linked list is vaguely appropriate?"
I dunno. While I am fully aware that there is no such thing as human endeavor without adjoining bullshittery, I'm not sure CS stacks up quite the same as molecular biology or, say, high-energy physics for having fairly concrete and irrefutable ground to cover. Its pretty clear cut what is there and what is up for interpretation, wheras in CS the whole field is inherantly abstracted to the point that a great deal is up for interpretation. Theoretical physics shares that level of abstraction, what with stuff like superstring theory and such, so it's all relative I guess. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
SO WHERE'S MY FUCKING LINK ALREADY? NT by Entropy Stew 03/29/2003, 3:34am PST 
YOU SEE THIS SHIT -> NT by Entropy Stew 03/29/2003, 3:35am PST 
I DIDN'T EVEN HAVE TO *TYPE* THAT SHIT NT by Entropy Stew 03/29/2003, 3:35am PST 
LEAT NT by foogla 03/29/2003, 5:54am PST 
Revolutionizing posting FOREVA. NT by Jhoh Creexul 03/29/2003, 7:01am PST 
SIR YOU BROKE THE STEALTH FAKE NT (nt) by creativepig 03/29/2003, 2:30pm PST 
RELEASE THE HOUNDS! NT by Matt Boyd 03/29/2003, 3:31pm PST 
NOW I WANT A LINK RLOF by Jhoh Creexul 03/30/2003, 11:11am PST 
Okay by Matt Boyd 04/01/2003, 10:22am PST 
Actually, you've nearly doubled our pageviews by Entropy Stew 04/01/2003, 10:56am PST 
Whoops! That was me. Nevermind. NT by Multiple Makers 04/01/2003, 2:04pm PST 
Last 3/4s March unique visitors went from 2000 to 5000 since link (more) by Senor Barborito 04/01/2003, 12:01pm PST 
Re: Okay by Jhoh Creexul 04/01/2003, 1:47pm PST 
Re: Okay by Matt Boyd 04/05/2003, 11:07pm PST 
Re: Okay by Jhoh Creexul 04/05/2003, 11:41pm PST 
Re: Okay by ydrt 04/05/2003, 11:50pm PST 
Check the front page. NT by Matt Boyd 04/06/2003, 12:32am PST 
Re: Check the front page. by ydrt 04/06/2003, 12:43am PST 
My answer by Senor Barborito 04/06/2003, 1:14am PST 
^is that how you masturbate your own ego?^ by baiting barbarito 04/08/2003, 11:15am PDT 
Re: My answer by FoK 04/08/2003, 11:22am PDT 
Re: My answer by Forensic 04/08/2003, 7:45pm PDT 
Re: My answer by Chairman Mao 04/08/2003, 8:56pm PDT 
So Physics? by Anonymous 04/09/2003, 1:58pm PDT 
Physics asks the fundamental question, "what is real?" by Chairman Mao 04/09/2003, 2:21pm PDT 
The real question Physics asks: "what is fundamental?" (nt) by David Lewis 04/09/2003, 9:32pm PDT 
true NT by Chairman Mao 04/09/2003, 9:46pm PDT 
Re: So Physics? by Ray, of Light 04/09/2003, 3:24pm PDT 
Re: So Physics? by Chairman Mao 04/09/2003, 3:36pm PDT 
Re: So Physics? by FOF 04/09/2003, 3:45pm PDT 
Ah by I need clarification 04/09/2003, 9:10pm PDT 
Re: Ah by Chairman Mao 04/09/2003, 9:15pm PDT 
Attn CS we want our Science back since you obviously aren't using it. [-NT-] ^_^ NT by Callow Sniper 04/09/2003, 8:38pm PDT 
Re: My answer by Matt Boyd 04/09/2003, 3:39pm PDT 
That's a horse of an entirely different color by Chairman Mao 04/09/2003, 3:45pm PDT 
Re: Check the front page. by The Mighty Irishman 04/08/2003, 10:14am PDT 
BRILLIANT SWIPE AT OMM NT by Entropy Stew 03/30/2003, 5:14pm PST 
|
|