|
|
Forum Overview
::
Reviews
|
|
|
by Entropy Stew 08/29/2004, 10:42pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zseni wrote:
William H. Hayt, Jr. wrote:
curst wrote:
SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!!! + boring = boring.
According to this equation, boring - boring = supply zones. 0 = supply zones? I DON'T FUCKING THINK SO.
+*( The math cyclops is crying and it's all your fault.
It's fatuous to assume that curst is using the + operator as we understand it for use under Z and its sub- and super-structures, especially since none of the elements participating in the operation are numbers. Especially fatuous is the assumption that the operation ("addition") has identity "0", interpreted so traditionally as an integer value. While + formally (typically) denotes a commutative operation, it's also not a given that SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!!! + boring = boring + SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!!!, nor is it a given that boring has an inverse under the operation.
But let's assume, in order to cut down on speculation and give your cyclops something to be more cheerful about, that + is a well-defined binary operation and SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!! and boring are elements of a set being operated upon, and we assume moreover that the set is closed under the operation. These qualifications are pure formalisms strictly for the cyclops' sake.
I find it much more plausible that "supply zones" is the operation identity, making boring + (-boring) = supply zones a simple MOF from an assumed group structure of game elements. That is to say: adding supply zones to any game does not improve any more than it degrades the quality of the game. Moreover, "SUPPLY ZONES" may be a divisor of the operation identity - not at all uncommon - with !!!!!!!! being the other divisor under an assumed ring structure of game elements (implying that SUPPLY ZONES * !!!!!!!! + anything = anything where SUPPLY ZONES + anything = anyotherthing.)
If your math cyclops is crying, I hope this brief detour into group and ring theory cheers him up. He will find further trenchant reading here and here, although commutative rings are but one of many sorts of rings he can learn about at that page.
Here you go overcomplicating and obfuscating things as usual. Curst's original statement becomes accurate when one looks at it in a boolean or set theoretical context.
Observe:
boring ∧ SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!!! = boring
Now, what does this remind you of? Slash fiction? Close!
The Identity Law states:
A ∨ 0 = A
A ∧ 1 = A
Given Kohan as empirical evidence, I think we can safely assume that SUPPLY ZONES!!!!!!!! is true.
-/ES/- |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Here's your goddamn Kohan review by FABIO 08/24/2004, 11:15pm PDT 
Short short version: a shitty realtime HOMM with autoresolved combat NT by Entropy Stew 08/25/2004, 4:35am PDT 
Shorter version: Dungeon Siege, except ugly as fuck NT by curst 08/25/2004, 8:55am PDT 
Whoops, I forgot: AND WITH SUPPLY ZONES! NT by curst 08/25/2004, 8:57am PDT 
Re: Here's your goddamn Kohan review by Ice Cream Jonsey 08/27/2004, 4:23pm PDT 
no, just the original Kohan by FABIO 08/28/2004, 12:11pm PDT 
Re: no, just the original Kohan by curst 08/29/2004, 2:36pm PDT 
Re: no, just the original Kohan by FABIO 08/29/2004, 2:39pm PDT 
Re: no, just the original Kohan by William H. Hayt, Jr. 08/29/2004, 3:27pm PDT 
Re: no, just the original Kohan by Zseni 08/29/2004, 3:59pm PDT 
I hope everybody who read that feels as good about themselves as I do. +) NT by William H. Hayt, Jr. 08/29/2004, 4:13pm PDT 
Translated for those who don't read boring by Translator 08/29/2004, 7:22pm PDT 
HURRR I don't think and its great and stuff. NT by Dumb Guy 08/29/2004, 7:25pm PDT 
You don't know what you're missing. Overanalyzing quips and shit. NT by Smart Guy 08/29/2004, 9:37pm PDT 
I don't use words like that and its boring. NT by Dumb Guy 08/29/2004, 9:58pm PDT 
U Imp0st3r...duuuuurrrrr.... NT by Reel dUmb g|_|y 08/29/2004, 10:04pm PDT 
a/s/l? NT by Dumb Gurl 08/29/2004, 10:08pm PDT 
Fun is the hour hand; it's now boring o'clock. Supply zones add 12 hours. NT by Ray of Light 08/29/2004, 8:26pm PDT 
She's stuck with a digital watch and all she can do is set her alarm. NT by Pieter 08/29/2004, 10:27pm PDT 
Even Ray is right twice a day by Entropy Stew 08/29/2004, 10:42pm PDT 
Meant to be in reply to Zseni, but you get the idea NT by Entropy Stew 08/29/2004, 10:44pm PDT 
Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Zseni 08/30/2004, 1:40pm PDT 
Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Smart Guy 08/30/2004, 3:37pm PDT 
Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Zseni 08/30/2004, 4:40pm PDT 
Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Worm 08/30/2004, 4:50pm PDT 
What's the Church's position on this thread? NT by Richard the Lionhear-UNF UNF UNF 08/30/2004, 5:00pm PDT 
Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Zseni 08/30/2004, 5:36pm PDT 
Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Worm 08/30/2004, 6:31pm PDT 
Please answer yes. by CCHPW 08/30/2004, 7:33pm PDT 
Nope. NT by Worm 08/30/2004, 7:45pm PDT 
The suffering continues. NT by CCHPW 08/30/2004, 7:53pm PDT 
Re: Even Ray is right twice a day by Zseni 08/30/2004, 8:04pm PDT 
I took your post for an excuse to wax pedagogical. How wrong I was! by Entropy Stew 08/30/2004, 11:32pm PDT 
Re: I took your post for an excuse to wax pedagogical. How wrong I was! by Zseni 08/31/2004, 10:53am PDT 
Hur Hur Hur by Senseebl Obs 08/31/2004, 4:06pm PDT 
hahaha by FABIO 05/16/2008, 4:19pm PDT 
|
|
|
|
|