 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| "We" got your answers right here, bitch by Google 03/02/2003, 7:22pm PST | ||||
 |
 |
|||
Mr. Palomar wrote: Google has found problems in your search: - The "AND" operator is unnecessary -- we include all search terms by default. - "replete" (and any subsequent words) was ignored because we limit queries to 10 words. Also, it turns our we don't include all search terms by default. Our bad. - "replete" would have been ignored in any case -- it's a fairly gay word. - The following words are very common and were not included in your search: the of of. - The following phrases are very common, and lacking in meaning, and were not included in your search: "of superior quality" "do you know of" "infinitely many and complex" - Your search may return poor results, because it is worded fruitily. Did you mean Photoshop sites with tutorials and explanations? |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
Three questions in the second person plural by 03/02/2003, 4:52pm PST  "We" got your answers right here, bitch by 03/02/2003, 7:22pm PST Your tubers, my fruit by 03/02/2003, 9:24pm PST Re: Three questions in the second person plural by 03/02/2003, 10:19pm PST clean-up, isle mcgee --nt-- NT by 03/02/2003, 10:32pm PST The foum killjoy with no rules! -nt- by 03/05/2003, 5:24pm PST Re: Three questions in the second person plural by 03/05/2003, 3:34am PST "Common Sense Is Not So Common" - Voltron by 03/05/2003, 11:29am PST I feel bad that I can't help you, aspiring graphics kid. by 03/05/2003, 3:49pm PST I'm taking you out of my lineup. n/t by 03/05/2003, 4:08pm PST |
