 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| The 'false flags' of the Sandy Hook Massacre and September 11, 2001 by Tansin A. Darcos 08/31/2022, 3:56pm PDT | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| Alex Jones is having to pay a lot of money to the surviving families of the Sandy Hook massacre because he claimed it was a "false flag" operation, that the "victims " were actually actors, etc. In short, he's having to pay the "stupid asshole tax" for saying something both ridiculous and stupid, and acting like a douchebag.
All of thes "conspiracy theorists" who think that 9/11 was an inside job, or a false flag operation, that the planes were empty when they crashed, or, in Alex Jones case, that Sandy Hook was also a false flag operation, and the deaths were staged. I have just one question: Why? If some shadow organization or government agency wants to create some public tragedy to push some agenda, why would they care if hundreds or thousands of people died? Why not just allow innocent people to actually be killed? If someone is of the sociopathic mindset of creating a fake crisis, there's nothing better than a real body count to sicken, disgust, or drive people to snger than a nice juicy massacre. Why bother to reduce the body count, when actual dead people improve the chances that your plan will succeed. Do I think either of these events was a false flag? No, I think they were actual tragedies where an independent person or group committed atrocities upon innocent victims. But someone who claims major loss-of-life incidents were staged (i.e. "false flag") and there were no actual deaths, fails to understand the mindset of someone setting up such a thing. Staging a fake event with simulated deaths is more difficult, more expensive, and less effective than a real tragedy with actual corpses. If you want to show a massacre at a church site, a bus full of real dead nuns will be far more effective than a faked event. Plus, if itt's a fake, you have to make sure whoever is involved in the cover-up doesn't talk or blackmail you, so if the chances are very high that you're going to have to kill people to keep it secret anyway, it's far better for your purposes to have other people die for your cause. Plus, if someone tries to claim it was a planned conspiracy, they will look like a crackpot to the general public, and you can liquidate the traitor to your cause at any convenient time. Remember, also, some people who want to set up atrocities are not necessarily from Western countries like those in North America or Europe who generally respect human life. Some of these people come from Asian, African, Muslim, or third-world countries where life is cheap, assassination a tradition, and places where if you're not part of their sect of their religion, you're an infidel or nothing who can be casually killed if you get in their way. Who are the most hated religion by Muslims in Sunni and Shia sects? Jews, Israelis? Be serious, they hate each other far worse than they hate Jews. Sunni hate Shia, Shia hate Sunni, and everyone else is only a secondary hatred. So, while they hate members of the wrong sect most, they'll kill non-Muslims if none of the other sect are available. With fanatics like these, who needs to fake killings, when there are plenty of sociopaths willing to do real killing at the drop of a burning Quran. |
||||
 |
 |
|||
|
The 'false flags' of the Sandy Hook Massacre and September 11, 2001 by 08/31/2022, 3:56pm PDT  Re: The 'false flags' of the Sandy Hook Massacre and September 11, 2001 by 08/31/2022, 5:58pm PDT Mischief Maker, you've misunderstood me or I didn't make myself clear by 08/31/2022, 10:41pm PDT Because "false flag" was in the zeitgeist for decades. Hammer bros seeing nails. NT by 09/01/2022, 8:07am PDT "If all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail." NT by 09/07/2022, 7:50am PDT |
