Forum Overview :: Tansin A. Darcos's Alter Ego
 
Re: Understanding the Future (Part I) by laudablepuss 08/17/2022, 8:25am PDT
Tuey wrote:

"You might consider currency to be the original non-fungible token"

No, nobody would do that. Currency is under the very definition of fungible. It has to be.

Do you really not understand that?


Exactly. Fungability is literally the difference between an NFT and a cryptocurrency. I'm afraid to read the original post . . . good lord, Tdarcos.
PREVIOUS NEXT REPLY QUOTE
 
Understanding the Future (Part I) by Tansin A. Darcos 08/12/2022, 9:20am PDT NEW
    tDarcos, you're still wrong about what non-fungable means NT by Unique like you and Me 08/16/2022, 11:48pm PDT NEW
    The time's nigh that finally information will start to actually trump NT by Capital 08/17/2022, 12:14am PDT NEW
    Re: Understanding the Future (Part I) by Tuey 08/17/2022, 5:37am PDT NEW
        Re: Understanding the Future (Part I) by laudablepuss 08/17/2022, 8:25am PDT NEW
            Re: Understanding the Future (Part I) by Ice Cream Jonsey 08/17/2022, 12:31pm PDT NEW
    Currency is more than 2500 years old, not 200 years old. by Fullofkittens 08/17/2022, 7:01am PDT NEW
        Re: Currency is more than 2500 years old, not 200 years old. by Tansin A. Darcos 08/22/2022, 7:56am PDT NEW
    My error by Tansin A. Darcos 08/23/2022, 6:24am PDT NEW
 
powered by pointy