|
|
Forum Overview
::
Cyberpunk 2077
|
|
|
by Thanks, Jason 01/24/2021, 2:11am PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
"One developer told me of the time he hired an infamously-negative-scoring reviewer to write a mock review for his studio's gameānot because the developer wanted feedback, but because they wanted to make sure this reviewer would have to disclose[sic] himself from writing a review and impacting the Metascore accordingly."
Any ideas who the infamously-negative-scoring reviewer is? The list of suspects isn't long. Here's a hint: Jason links to his 2013 Kotaku article that mentioned Tom as an aberrantly low scorer and lead to that self righteous post about him being the Pauline Kael of gaming(a woman who did not assign scores to movies, but whatever).
At least Tom discloses that he does mock reviews. Way at the bottom of his Patreon page:
"Of course, I have recused myself from an official public review for those titles. ... You now know the sum total of all my potential conflicts of interest. I will update this section if it develops."
Those aren't "potential" conflicts of interest, those ARE conflicts of interest. Whatever issues Schreier has, Tom doesn't have a leg to stand on. Giving Metacritic scores to companies you've taken money from is bullshit. Try and find any non-video game outlet that would admit they'd let an employee do that. His claim that he doesn't write mock reviews anymore is horseshit too, he did one for Anthem a couple years ago.
And does he disclose his "potential" conflicts in any of his reviews, or anywhere on his stupid blog? Nope. That's why you had to have it pointed it out here.
So for example, he wrote a mock review of FF15. Gee, I'm sure the Japanese dev team really needed the badly translated feedback of a geezer who writes crank reviews most gamers laugh off. What a complete waste of money. Or was it?
He then goes on to review a Tomb Raider game from the same publisher two years later, giving it one star. Any mention of the fact that he's taken money from Square Enix, and that tarnishing the Metacritc average reminds Squenix what happens when they don't pay him? Nope.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Jason Schrier at it again with another "What Went Wrong" by Mysterio 01/21/2021, 5:46pm PST 
From the outlet that claimed China hacked microchips in Apple hardware by No Pulitzers for that one 01/21/2021, 11:47pm PST 
Schreier is terrible. by The Grim Sleeper 01/22/2021, 6:04am PST 
Wait 'till game journos finds out about Japanese work culture by Mysterio 01/22/2021, 2:28pm PST 
Falling over yourselves to defend a 6/10 game NT by to own the game journos 01/23/2021, 6:41am PST 
Re: Falling over yourself to defend a 0/10 journo NT by Jack Bauer 01/23/2021, 9:38am PST 
The one thing Schrier is good at is cataloguing gaming dumpster fires NT by Don't take it away from him 01/23/2021, 10:35am PST 
He also confirmed that Tom Chick takes payoffs to NOT ding Metacritic scores NT by Thanks, Jason 01/23/2021, 12:12pm PST 
Where is that? by Kirahu Nagasawa 01/23/2021, 7:24pm PST 
Here by Thanks, Jason 01/24/2021, 2:11am PST 
Re: Here by Cantbot 01/24/2021, 2:23am PST 
He needs scores to elevate gaming discourse with his brilliant contrarian takes? NT by Thanks, Jason 01/24/2021, 2:31am PST 
Re: Here by Ichabod 01/24/2021, 10:31am PST 
Re: Here by Thanks, Jason 01/24/2021, 11:50am PST 
What you say makes sense. NT by Ichabod 01/24/2021, 2:50pm PST 
Is this terrible? I don't think so. He got the guy to apologize. by Teuy 09/04/2022, 2:54pm PDT 
Hope you like games like the new Saint's Row by Mysterio 09/05/2022, 2:23pm PDT 
Thank you Jason, for protecting me from devs who're passionate about their games by Grateful Gamer 09/08/2022, 3:17pm PDT 
|
|
|
|
|