|
by Over the Peak 11/21/2015, 2:02pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
"They won't give us free review copies!", cried the children who are fed hand-to-mouth from PR. Of course, now, crooks alike seek the support of the masses they completely shit on to help harass in their favor. Oops! And as if they are simply unable to review without an advance copy? Wow, you can't be the first ones to break coverage for those clicks! Ahhh, no tears, please. It's a waste of good suffering.
Souffle of Pain wrote:
Publishers figured out it was a waste of time to bother with a tabloid trying to play gotcha. Good. Dirtsheets, like Kotaku, want to throw everyone under the bus with perceived scandal and rumor while trying to put themselves over in the process. They're just spoiled bloggers despite all of Totilo's hot air about his supposed hard working investigative journalists (????). Public facing reps need to stop using the company card to make e-friends, and hopefully this continues.
Gawker said they're going to mulch a bunch of their sites to pour everything into in the 2016 election cycle. Only the home page, plus Gizmodo, were specifically listed as exempt.
Does Kotaku face the firing squad? God willing. |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|