|
by bombMexico 03/28/2011, 9:14pm PDT |
|
 |
|
 |
|
a dude can't play as a girl and complain about how hot she is. You're not fooling anyone staring at her tits and then white knighting about her tits. Its like i dunno complaining about marios perfect full mustache and oh he just jumps so high. Its a game, mario was born wearing that mustache, can jump forever and every sorceress has learned eye of giant tits in their first year at the white tower. This type of game wants to be taken seriously? What medieval fantasy whatever game hasn't had chainmail that ends at the midriff? Even Lord of the Rings had stupid hot warrior girls tooling around where they don't belong, asshole :)
Dr M Schadenfreude Von Katze, PhDD wrote:
Am I the only one who thought the gameplay was horribly broken? I'm fairly new to this generation of RPGs, my experience with the genre jumps from the early Fallout's and Torment to Bloodlines, then to Mass Effect, Alpha Protocol, Fallout 3 and New Vegas.
Now, I think all of those range from fairly manageable to downright beautiful to play. I tried the DA2 demo, though, and I found the combat to be a chaotic nonsense where I would just randomly hit the occasional monster while struggling with the real enemy: The wonky camera that insisted on having me looking at a vast plain of nothingness while all the action took place behind my character's back (or in front of her, but outside the screen anyway).
It felt like the game wanted me to move the character with an analog stick while clicking on stuff with a mouse. Some travesty.
Also, the cleavage on that wizard girl? Are we *still* doing this? In fact, isn't this one of those games that wants to be taken seriously? I'm all for having pretty girls on my games; in fact, give more pretty girls in my games, I say, but COME ON. This is Lara Croft-tackiness we're talking here.
Negative! |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
