 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
| It's pretty clear that a lot of options had to be cut at the end by Lizard_King 11/28/2010, 9:20am PST | ||||
 |
 |
|||
| I would be very surprised if there weren't plans to allow you to work with any of the handlers throughout the story, for instance, or at least a variation as deep as what can happen with Parker. The Taiwan level also has a prime example of cut content, as you are clearly supposed to have more options with all of that stuff you find in the Triad level, and I believe the devs have talked a bit about how the Sis/G22 angle was cut short (which is probably for the best depending on where they planned to go with that). An AP2 with funding would have been a majestic thing, and I fully blame the press reaction of having people that either expected a third person shooter or simply don't understand the rpg/story component handling it. The Edge review was almost entirely comparisons to gears of war and bitching about the graphics and animation, and one whole paragraph on the characters, story and consequences. | ||||
 |
 |
|||
|
The plot makes my head explode at the end but otherwise this is really good by 11/27/2010, 5:57pm PST  Something made Fortinbras lose his shit NT by 11/27/2010, 9:27pm PST I apologize, I meant to post this on a video game review site NT by 11/28/2010, 9:35am PST You've convinced me to buy it. Good review. NT by 11/28/2010, 4:57am PST It's pretty clear that a lot of options had to be cut at the end by 11/28/2010, 9:20am PST It's not the cut content that bothers me, it's the logic surrounding Leland by 11/28/2010, 9:54am PST I think they basically ended up tying up every loose end they remembered through by 11/28/2010, 7:33pm PST |
