|
by Mysterio 01/29/2005, 5:16pm PST |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Robert Roy Britt wrote:
The scientists actually had to pay these guys, in the form of extra juice, to get them to look at images of lower-ranking monkeys.
Curiously, the monkeys in the test hadn't had any direct physical contact with the monkeys in the photos, so they didn't have personal experience with who was hot and who was not.
I've only once paid for porn, and I would only pay again if it were for pictures of somebody I knew.
I was 15 and I traded my gameboy for a slot car set that had its manual stuffed with pictures of surfer girls in bathing suits. The guy had told me about the girls in advance, and they sealed what turned out to be a pretty lopsided deal (only one of the cars worked and the best picture was an ass shot). Still, for someone who'd been jerking off to the summer wear section of a Woman's Weekly, it felt like progress.
Unfortunately, when I was a young wanker, I would naively destroy my porn by cumming on it every couple of months to try and get back on wagon. I remember, several days after destroying these pictures, dying for a wank and fishing a couple of the destroyed pictures out of the bin. They were scrunched and discoloured in a few key spots. If I was trying to wank over it now, I would pretend the cumstains were bruises and go for a rape fantasy, but that kind of flexibility only comes with experience, and at that stage I had only been wanking for a year.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|