Forum Overview :: American McGee's Honda Civic

Was there something wrong with Windows 2000? by laudablepuss 05/15/2009, 1:33pm PDT I didn't understand why they came out with XP so soon after 2000 was released, w2k was a great operating system! Windows 2000 is NT 5.0, and XP is 5.1 (server 2003 is 5.2). Vista is 6.0 and this new thing, which by the old numbering scheme should be 6.1 or 6.2 (I think server 2008 is 6.1?), is being called 7.0 Why, I ask? It has a new task bar. Everything else appears to be exactly like Vista. Do we get WinFS yet? No. So WTF. :(

Is Caltrops optimistic or pessimistic about Windows 7? NT by motherfuckerfoodeater 05/15/2009, 8:34am PDT     I will try it, at least. NT by Last 05/15/2009, 9:03am PDT         Have Vista, not going to spend 200$ on an OS Upgrade NT by Fortinbras 05/15/2009, 10:39am PDT     I've got it on my netbook by I need clarification 05/15/2009, 10:48am PDT         Wifey NT by Zsenitan 05/15/2009, 11:17am PDT     I want to rant about their naming conventions. by Fussbett 05/15/2009, 11:28am PDT         Hello? by Windows XP 05/15/2009, 11:49am PDT             Oops, yeah, XP (Experience) as the transition between ME and a full word. NT by Fussbett 05/15/2009, 12:05pm PDT         Was there something wrong with Windows 2000? by laudablepuss 05/15/2009, 1:33pm PDT             Yes. NT by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/15/2009, 1:38pm PDT             WinFS is the Duke Nukem Forever of filesystems NT by Entropy Stew 05/15/2009, 2:33pm PDT             I agree, I ran Win2000 well into the XP lifespan (maybe why I forgot about XP) by Fussbett 05/15/2009, 2:46pm PDT