dby "stupid" slushl strikes again. by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/06/2009, 10:51pm PDT
Followed immediately by danuh steevins. by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/06/2009, 11:11pm PDT
fuck this sounds horrible now NT by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/07/2009, 4:40am PDT
Liberal troll Roddenberry reaches out from beyond the grave. NT by motherfuckerfoodeater 05/07/2009, 8:37am PDT
Christian Toto: Is new ‘Star Trek’ conservative? by Creexuls, a monster >:3 05/07/2009, 9:13am PDT
Review: Using "reboot" as a ultra-cool replacement for "remake." by motherfuckerfoodeater 05/07/2009, 9:19am PDT
I don't think they're supposed to be synonymous. NT by Fullofkittens 05/07/2009, 11:08am PDT
that's right, you're RIGHT NT by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/07/2009, 12:49pm PDT
This is part of the problem. by motherfuckerfoodeater 05/07/2009, 4:25pm PDT
It just means they can pretend that the previous sequels never happened. NT by Fullofkittens 05/07/2009, 5:03pm PDT
Still bullshit by motherfuckerfoodeater 05/08/2009, 12:11pm PDT
*ahem* I would expect the CACHE to be clea*COUGH COUGH CHO NT by Fullofkittens 05/08/2009, 12:25pm PDT
ok so it's a retcon NT by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/08/2009, 3:33pm PDT
actually I think it's more like a prequel than a reboot (hopefully) :( NT by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/07/2009, 6:49pm PDT
It's a jackboot by stomping on the face of a trekkie 05/07/2009, 7:45pm PDT
it's a reboot and not a remake because by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/07/2009, 3:05pm PDT
Re: Review: Using "reboot" as a ultra-cool replacement for "remake." by Choson 05/07/2009, 5:35pm PDT
Speaking of lazy bullshit metaphors by motherfuckerfoodeater 05/29/2009, 9:39am PDT
I was hoping to catch this in the theater with crank 2 at the same time by Weyoun Voidbringer 05/07/2009, 7:10pm PDT
|
|