Forum Overview :: Motherfucking News :: Don't fall down that slippery slope!!!

[quote name="Mischief Maker"][quote name="Creation Scientists"]After the rise of old-age beliefs, however, some scientists caved in and ‘re-interpreted’ the Bible to fit them. For example, some claimed that the days in Genesis 1 were really ages, and that Noah’s Flood was one of many catastrophes. For proof that such ‘re-interpretations’ are fallacious, see Q&A Genesis and Noah’s Flood Covered the Whole Earth. These old-earth Christians may have meant well, but their faulty model was an easy target for <I><FONT COLOR="ff0000">Darwin</I></FONT>. For example, <I><FONT COLOR="ff0000">Darwin</I></FONT> pointed out that the fashionable theory—that each species had been independently created in their current location—made little sense of his observations that island species were often similar to those of the nearest continent. But his observations fit perfectly with the true biblical view that there was a global Flood, and that in the post-Flood world, animals migrated from Ararat to the islands via the neighbouring mainland. <B>This should be a lesson for those today who teach that Christians should compromise the plain meaning of the Bible to fit with ‘science’.</B> Aside from placing fallible human opinion as an authority above the infallible Word of God, it just doesn’t work and paves the way for more departure from Scripture.[/quote]