Forum Overview :: Reviews :: You need to write Metacritic management immediately to tell them what a bunch

[quote name="of stupid poopyheads they are"]<a href="https://imgur.com/iO0mcjP"><img src="https://i.imgur.com/iO0mcjP.png" title="source: imgur.com" /></a> See how bright red that 40 is, like a cockpit light telling you an engine is on fire? That means Metacritic considers a 2 out of 5 stars rating an F. Take it up with them. They even explicitly say they color code movies and games differently! I.E. a 2 out of 5 is 'mixed' for a movie, 'bad' for a game. Read it here genius: https://www.metacritic.com/about-metascores Never mind that Rotten Tomatoes is the aggregator everyone uses for movies, where a 3 out of 5 gets automatically upgraded. On Metacritic it doesn't. And that's where gamers would have actually read Tom's reviews, not on his shitty site where only whatever's left of his idiot clique will ever read his disclaimer that akshhhhhfully a 3 out of 5 isn't that bad. In fact, Nick Diamon, Tom's biggest simp, is probably the only one at qt3 who ever bothered reading that disclaimer. Which means you probably are Nick Diamon. Tom was banking on that to drive business to his mock review side hustle, the one he only discloses at the bottom of his Patreon about page. Tom's friends got real upset about that whole lack of disclosure thing regarding Youtubers doing paid videos, even though you just had to click "show more" in case you were too stupid to realize it was a paid video. But no tsk tsking from that crowd about Tom burying his disclosure way at the bottom of his Patreon intro.[/quote]