Forum Overview :: Motherfucking News :: Well done, you've unintentionally put up your finger directly on the

[quote name="problem"][quote name="Mysterious Stranger"]You breathlessly believed every word of the Hunter Biden story. I checked, it's still called the "Biden-Ukraine Conspiracy Theory" over on Wikipedia. Nothing's changed. You said all the intel officials that dismissed it as Soviet disinformation were lying. All of them. Do you remember? <a href="https://www.caltrops.com/pointy.php?action=viewPost&pid=205267">here's</a> the post where you or someone like you said that. Maybe you're not that guy. But if you agree with him and are huffing and puffing about well, you <i>can't trust Wikipedia</i> and all those <i>former US intel guys lied</i> I mean, when do you take a step back and listen to yourself? Again, if you're not that person then sorry. But please get help. Professional help. You will have to pay for the kind of help you need, but I'm begging you to do it. You are in a cult, you don't understand that you're in one but it causes everyone around you to pity you. You also have a weirdly unearned ego about this that makes you nasty towards rational people, probably because you can't comprehend that you fell for transparent, childish nonsense, as evidenced by your trying to pretend something "changed" here. Please, <b>get some help</b>. Your life would turn for the better so quickly. Get your shots, give up on not only the Big Lie that you believe but all these other small ones like this laptop rubbish. Your life will be richer, fuller and more rewarding if you can leave this cult. You're wasting your life right now and I don't want you to do that. I'm saying all this as a friend. [/quote] Hunter's laptop, Russian influence, "the pandemic is a hoax," "very fine people," horse dewormer, these are symptoms of the problem and they're doing their job of keeping you distracted. Sources like Wikipedia can't/won't update their articles if, instead of issuing retractions or corrections, or--better--publishing new articles, their sources perform stealth edits on previous works like WaPo and NYT have done. Of course, you have to have an individual who's willing to accept new information and adjust their conclusions accordingly. Didn't see this Politico update in the Wiki article: [imgur id="FghShWS"] https://imgur.com/a/FghShWS You toss around the term "cultist" pretty freely, but <a href="https://www.caltrops.com/pointy.php?action=viewPost&pid=205586">here's</a> a thread where you or someone like you accused a cop of cold blooded, racially motivated murder for saving the life of a stabbing assault victim <i>in spite of clear video evidence to the contrary</i> because your lying eyes contradicted the conclusion you'd already arrived at. Fortunately, friend, you don't need to pay anyone for the help you require, you just need to grow up and be willing to step outside your little echo chamber from time to time. Give my regards to your Discord brethren.[/quote]