Forum Overview
::
Dead Trees
::
Re: opinions on Greg Egan?
[quote name="Senor Barborito"][quote name="Colonel K"][quote name="Senor Barborito"]a book with the scope of Tolkien that doesn't suck AND isn't dry as fuck.[/quote] That pygmy dart of consensus just put to rest the part of me that's been trying to like LOTR for the last five years. Thankyou. [quote]if you get into the book it's . . . almost believable.[/quote] Is the narrative conducive to those long 'reader's bubble' periods you went through, or would I fuck up the believable continuity by reading it in chunks?[/quote] There's a few good natural breakpoints scattered throughout - and the book is composed of three 'books', all of which make EXCELLENT save points (I used them as such). However if your lifestyle affords it, my opinion is that books and games are much better to swallow in one lump. It shows you if the developer/author is doing something cool (Dune, Operation Flashpoint) in which the context/mechanics switches completely in a fairly natural manner, rather than plodding through the same system explored to the point of nausea (Half-Life, Neverwinter Nights). For me, GTA3 and Hitchhiker's Guide (the book) stand nearly alone as systems so diverse that they can be explored almost infinitely - and in which the context switch is controlled by the viewer/reader. --SB[/quote]