Caltrops - Star Citizen





	[quote name="skip"][quote name="Rey Mysterio Jr. "]<a href="http://www.kotaku.co.uk/2016/09/23/inside-the-troubled-development-of-star-citizen">I know it's Kotaku but "Inside the Troubled Development of Star Citizen" kind of sold me on it</a>[/quote] After that Escapist scare, Roberts even played ball and responded to critics. I wish there was a better idea on how much money is left but Roberts probably guards that information closely. There's no accusations of racism or mentions of his wife, but working under him sounds terrible. [quote]The final criticism that my sources directed at Roberts was his habit of directly contacting artists, designers, and programmers about their work, no matter how far down the chain, side-stepping his directors. [/quote] There's an entire section on how CryEngine was a terrible choice for this. Man's also got a severe case of Broussard-itis. [quote]Once, a source says, Chris came to work after playing The Order: 1886. Impressed by the highly detailed art, he asked CIG’s character artists to match that standard. The team, my sources told me, saw this as impossible. “That's fine for a single-player game where you're able to control stuff and stream things in a certain way,” one source explained. “You do not expect that for any kind of MMO or open world. But that's common knowledge for anyone that's worked in games.” “So, that irritates me,” Roberts said when I asked him about these particular events. (He concedes that they all took place.) “That is someone who has their preconceived notions and will settle for something that isn't good enough. The first and the third-person, there were a lot of people on the team who said that you cannot do it. They said it wasn't possible. Illfonic [the contractor building Star Marine] said the same thing. The same with the character stuff: I said we need to do it. And the inventory… it happens right now in [version] 2.4. You can put jackets and trousers on, and caps. There's layering with the armour. So everything that that person told you that couldn't happen, it's all in the game now and it's all at the quality [I asked for]. We've got as good or better than what 1886 has.[/quote] And fucking hell, some of what he says could come straight out of some parody of clueless managers in corporations. [quote]“That is an example of people saying 'No, I can't do it' and fighting that corner. They are the people I don't get on with and they are the people who end up not being at the company… If I was going to be clichéd, <b> if it was an American person I'd say I want an Ameri-can, not an Ameri-can't.</b> I want someone who tries [...] because we absolutely can do it. We’re trying to do something that has the fidelity that you see in The Order, or has the fidelity you see in a first-person shooter but has multiplayer online and this huge universe and I absolutely, to the very fibre of my being, know it can happen.[/quote] But if you're German or British fuck off. Bunch of naysayers. [quote]Another source flat-out believed that Star Citizen could not be made. “Not what they've promised, absolutely not. If it happened then I would believe in God.” They added: “the biggest obstacle to finishing, if you were going to take out money and time, is the scope. They could make a smaller game. They could make a really nice dogfighting shooter in space and it would probably do really well. That's the general attitude of most people in the industry.[/quote] [quote]“Will it be fun to play? Not sure. Will it be an amazing tech and beautiful art demo? Absolutely.”[/quote] What his backers should be scared of is that it will be all ambition and gee-whiz tech/art without much of a game or fun in there. Basically Spore for the 2010s.[/quote]