Forum Overview :: Rants :: Hi, my name is Ray

[quote name="Ray of Light"][quote]The only time someone should be able to access or read multiple people's information is if they are involved with developing an application that's handling batch processing such as system for generating bills.[/quote]And you get from "should" to "can" with an implementor who knows his business. There is no other way. <i>You</i> have not done the reading. You do not know what you're doing, to jeep you sound smart. It's unfortunate that you are old. A young person might use this experience to acquire respect for those that have come before, such as <a href=http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/bwk-on-pascal.html>Brian W. Kernighan</a>, or <a href=http://www.abebooks.com/book-search/isbn/0201896850/>this fucking clown</a>. Your strident posts suggest this option is off the table, and I doubt you'll even heed my advice to <i>never post on technical topics again, anywhere</i>. [quote]And in such cases, you have two people when this is done, one who is doing the work and the second - who doesn't know them, but is also a technically qualified person - to watch them to make sure they're not copying files. And even in their case, they need to access the data base one record at a time.[/quote]What the fuck? No. Nothing about this is right. Go search monster.com for the "watcher" position you imagine exists. I'm ignoring your other points on security because (i) they're wrong and (ii) a security breach is just one possible bad consequence, chosen arbitrarily from a vast universe, of using you to develop things. [/quote]